![Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre‐ and post‐test probabilities and their use in clinical practice - Akobeng - 2007 - Acta Paediatrica - Wiley Online Library Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre‐ and post‐test probabilities and their use in clinical practice - Akobeng - 2007 - Acta Paediatrica - Wiley Online Library](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/cms/asset/4084bfef-91fd-45d7-a7b9-80cef0dc84ab/apa_179_f1.gif)
Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre‐ and post‐test probabilities and their use in clinical practice - Akobeng - 2007 - Acta Paediatrica - Wiley Online Library
![Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber](https://www.nps.org.au/assets/AP/images/Algebra.png)
Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber
![Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber](https://www.nps.org.au/assets/AP/images/Fig1_Movingbeyond.png)
Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber
![ɹǝʇlnoԀ pıʌɐᗡ 🚴🏻 on Twitter: "@87biff @joshlavalleeMK From the findings in the paper is low sensitivity 0.52 relatively high specificity 8.9 Thus it's +ve likelihood ratio is 4.73 -ve likelihood ratio is ɹǝʇlnoԀ pıʌɐᗡ 🚴🏻 on Twitter: "@87biff @joshlavalleeMK From the findings in the paper is low sensitivity 0.52 relatively high specificity 8.9 Thus it's +ve likelihood ratio is 4.73 -ve likelihood ratio is](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EA4jO0eXoAEL36Q.jpg:large)
ɹǝʇlnoԀ pıʌɐᗡ 🚴🏻 on Twitter: "@87biff @joshlavalleeMK From the findings in the paper is low sensitivity 0.52 relatively high specificity 8.9 Thus it's +ve likelihood ratio is 4.73 -ve likelihood ratio is
![Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests - Australian Prescriber](https://www.nps.org.au/assets/AP/images/Algebra-2.png)